equity markets

View from the Chair: Windermere's Market Perspectives (March 2018)


Predictability and consistency.  Who among us doesn’t thrive under such conditions?  Most of us like things we can count on.  We enjoy feeling as if we are in control of what comes next.  We don’t like unexpected surprises (good or bad).  

2017 was such an environment for investors.  A welcome calm passage in the investing sea.   Investors could wake up each day and rest easy that markets would steadily climb and volatility would stay at bay.  Investors rejoiced in a year with a sub-3% maximum intraday move in the S&P 500.  Investors all-but forgot about 10% corrections, with the prior one having occurred over two years ago.   Investors began to ignore the virtual certainty that 2017 was an aberration – not a new normal.  And then the tides turned


Markets reversed course in late January/early February 2018.  And while many investors knew it would come (and that such moves are all part of the long-term investing process), we believe this time felt different as we seemed to be operating under the rule of “opposites”

1.)    Good News is now bad?  – Most market corrections are caused by fears of too little growth (ie: bad news) and the resulting recession and/or deflation.  This time, it was the opposite.  It appeared to be fears of too much growth (ie: good news) that was the problem.  With January job numbers and wage growth surprising on the upside, fears of higher growth (and resulting inflation) sent equity markets reeling and interest rates rising. 

2.)    Ignore fundamentals? – Most pullbacks are caused by a shift in fundamentals – such as an economic recession that causes companies’ earnings to fall.  However, this correction was again the opposite.  Fundamentals held steady during this time and actually improved as yearly earnings were announced.  It seemed sentiment and market technical were actually the ones in charge

3.)    Volatility is a leader?  – Typically, a sharp decline in stock prices will be followed by a rise in volatility.  This time, the opposite held true - volatility surged, which then caused equity prices to plunge.   Why the change?  Two words – Short Volatility.  After a year of extreme calm in the markets, “short volatility” had become a very popular trade (so crowded it overtook the long bitcoin trade in January 2018).  Essentially, with this trade, you are betting stocks will rise and volatility will fall and you win as long as those conditions hold.  When volatility reappeared in late January, millions (if not billions) looked to exit this strategy.  How do you exit a short volatility trade?  You buy volatility.  And what happens when there are countless buyers of volatility (ie: demand far above supply)?  Volatility rises.  This surge in volatility caused stocks to sell off, which then brought volatility up, and the circular reaction was off and running

Will these “opposites” subside and allow markets to return to a normal course?  Yes, we believe that to be true and have already started to see markets prove us right.  But volatility and a less-linear track are the new reality. Tightening of monetary policy and concerns surrounding fiscal policy (such as the recent proposed tariffs)  will keep markets on their toes.  However, we see several areas of strength underpinning markets, including:

  • Earnings:  Earnings are incredibly strong – and keep in mind, a stock is your share of future earnings/cash flows  (discounted at prevailing interest rate, see next point).  2018 year over year earnings are expected to grow by 18.8% ( per Thompson Reuters).  Q4 2017 earnings reports were exceptional, with 74% beating on  profits and 78% beating revenues (a record high since tracking began in 2008), as measured by FactSet


  • Interest rates:  Rising rates are a headwind for stocks.  As rates rise, future earnings and cash flows are discounted back at a higher rate, thereby acting as a drag on prices.  However, we believe that although rates may be rising, they have a long way to go to overcome earnings growth.  We’ve seen a ~0.40% rise in rates, compared to a projected ~19% growth in earnings.  That’s math we believe equity markets can handle


  • Economic strength:  Our preferred measure of economic growth is the index of Leading Economic Indicators.  This aggregates several key metrics and tracks their cumulative levels.  As you can see, it is trending up and reaching new highs. 

Perhaps of more interest is the trend in each of those factors – we don’t worry if they are “good or bad” but rather if they are getting “better or worse.”  At this time, none appear to be trending downward


  • The rhyming of history:  While we cannot be certain that past results will repeat, we do know that history tends to track in line with the past (or, rhyme).  Below charts show that both volatility and pullbacks are normal course in markets – and certainly don’t negate the possibility of positive returns

This chart shows the largest declines in the MSCI World index since 1980, as well as the largest percent decline in that same year.  Lesson learned: Annual returns can still be overwhelming positive in a year with a material drawdown




This second chart shows has the S&P 500 does in years following low volatility years, like the one we just were blessed with.  Lesson learned:  Following year usually sees larger downward moves - but performance remains positive.

Of course, we don't know what the future holds.  Nonetheless, these charts provide some historical context to today's reality.


The calm investing waters of 2017 were a treat, but now the tides have turned.  Winds are picking up and the waves are getting steeper.  But that's no reason to abandon your investing voyage.  We believe the increased gusts will act in your favor and help you reach your ultimate destination.  To quote Warren Buffett's annual letter,   "in America, equity investors have the wind that their back."  We couldn't agree more Warren, and we will see you out on the open seas.

Invest on,




View from the Chair: Windermere's Market Perspectives (December 2017)

154 days – time it took from the Dow to go from 21,000 to 22,000 closing value

77 days – time it took for the Dow to go from 22,000 to 23,000 closing value

43 days – time it took for the Dow to go from 23,000 to 24,000 closing value

These are startling ranges, especially when you consider they ALL occurred between March 1, 2017 and November 30, 2017.  

Needless to say, it's been an incredible year for the risk-adjusted accumulation of wealth, across many asset classes but in particular equities.  As we’ve written about in past posts, the synchronization of numerous factors (growth in virtually all major economies, stronger corporate earnings, easy monetary policy, and ongoing low interest rates to name a few) have led to a stark increase in equity markets.  While these moves are good news for investors, they have resulted in two very common questions:  when is it all going to end and when should we get out?

Let’s take each of these in turn.  When is it all going to end (with “it” being the rise in equities)? 


It would be disingenuous to say we can answer this question 100% accurately.  What we can say is, based on our research and knowledge, we don’t see a bear market (defined as a 20% correction) in the near future.  The explanations of why that is are very involved – but at a high level, (1) there are little signs of a pending recession (from the economic data and the rate/direction of change in those data points), (2) earnings and growth remain strong and support valuations, (3) equities still offer an attractive return vs. other asset classes, (4) global central banks keep easing, which leaves US rates low and (5) cash still remains on the sidelines and is likely to enter equities after such a strong year, buoying demand.  While there could be corrections for other reasons (political events or geopolitical risks), as it relates to fundamental reasons, we don’t see one looming.  Keep on walking - you haven't reach the end of the road yet. 

Now, for the second question – when should we get out? 


This question we can answer with great certainty.  The answer: never.  Never?  How can that be?  Wouldn’t it be best to get out the minute we see signs of a recession and then get back in once we see things turn?  Wouldn’t a wise investor have exited equity markets in early 2007 and gotten back in March 2009.    Of course – that would be ideal.  But markets can’t be predicted with that level of precision and anyone that tells you they can time them that way is likely highly overstating the truth. 

The only way to build wealth over a long period of time is to set an asset allocation with a risk profile you can tolerate – even in down markets – and then stay the course.  That is no easy task.  That approach is not for the faint of heart.  For if you follow this approach, you’re actually reallocating funds to asset classes that have fallen (or will continue to fall) in value.  Much harder than buying on the way up.  So, to flashback to 2008/2009, you would have been adding to your equity category.  Much easier said than done.

Why do you have to stay in?  Simply because you never know which hours, days, weeks, months, of years are going to contribute the most to your aggregate returns over your investing timeframe.  As this chart from Charles Schwab shows, there is a drastic difference in returns from missing the top x number of trading days from 1997-2016.  As an example, if you missed the top 10 trading days (that’s 10 days in almost 19 years!), your annualized return is almost cut if half (4% vs. 7.7%).  If you miss the top 20 days, your return falls from 7.7% to 1.6%.  See what we mean?  Best way to avoid missing these important days – never get out.


Given the strength in 2017, this analysis is likely to have become even more pronounced.  Imagine if you had shifted away from equities in 2017 - you would have missed an incredible investing period.  The point is – you never know with 100% certainty what each day will bring, so you have to be on the course at all times.  Some sections of the trail are easier than others but in the end, it’s the entire journey that matters – not each spot along the path.

Invest on.  Trust me, it’ll be a worthwhile adventure.